Review of Related Literatures and Studies Essay

The prop anents reviewed some(prenominal) related studies and literature. This was done to clarify contrasting ideas from other studies and literature. Relevant ideas of some students who genuine some softw ar were also reviewed. associate LiteratureThe proponents understand that the program to be made without intellectual development could flash and might not be attracted to the uses and beneficiaries. The parley between the target user and the programmer should be clear, and sharp. According to George Gerard G. Mendoza (2005), two reasons wherefore people use computers regardless of their profession.First, they are fast. Second, they are accurate. To improve the current rank constitution, manual and duplicative tasks need to be computerized. cybernation of tasks will also pave the means for the unification of the grading placement with the readjustment system and student information system. Josefina Estolas in the book Fundamentals of Research (1995).A major purpose of a database system is to provide users with an abstract view of data. That is the system hides certain details of how the data are stored and maintained as stated by Abraham Silberschatz, Database System Concepts (1999). A database is an organized sight of facts and information. An organizations database can contain facts and information on customers, employees, inventory, competitors, sales information and much more. most Managers and executive believe a database is one of the most valuable and important separate of a computer-basedRelated Literature unusual StudyAccording to Ms. Barbara Riggs and Mr. Jacob I. Lee (1994) of the University of atomic number 101 as they perceived from their study as regards with the old grading system of their university and the problems encountered. It is a daunting task to process 130,000 localises in a timely let tot each(prenominal)y painless manner both semester. hit to this the collection of Early Warning regularizes and at that place is a tremendous amount of achievement for bothour administrative staff and the mental faculty. Therefore, it was no surprise when several faculties voiced business organisation over the traditional time-consuming run collection process.Our established method of fool collection was similar to other universities during the mid(prenominal) 80s. Scannable grade canvasss were produced for each charge section and distributed to the faculty. Over 8,000 grade sheets were created every semester and then(prenominal) hand carried to academic departments by R & R support staff. The departments were then responsible for delivering grade sheets to the appropriate instructor. later all this routing, it was not unusual for a faculty atom to request a new grade sheet because the headmaster had been lost or damaged.Once the grade sheet made it to the faculty members hands, they were required to write the grade and then fill in the identical bubble with a 2 draw on the scanning form. If mistakes were made the faculty member had to be sure to run through the incorrect mark completely. Erasures often take to scanner misreads and recording of incorrect grades. susceptibility were also required to return all grade sheets to the Records & Registrations office within 48 hours of their final exam.Grade sheets were not permitted to be returned by mail because they could not be folded, but, more importantly, because mailing created security issues. Obviously, the plate of organization and centralization of grade sheet distribution and collection was enormous. Because of security concerns, controls had to be foolproof. Grade correction was very leaden and time-consuming. So, as technological capabilities and services were successfully developed for students, both faculty and administrators power saw the potential to automate the existing grade collection process.